Build Vs. Buy in Industrial DataOps: Four Key Considerations for Enterprise Leaders

In today's fiercely competitive industrial landscape, enterprise leaders consistently face pivotal decisions that could either propel their organizations forward or leave them lagging in the digital transformation race. One such critical decision is the choice between building a custom industrial DataOps solution or buying an off-the-shelf system.

This choice is far from trivial, as it impacts not just the immediate operational capacity but also the long-term strategic positioning of the company. In navigating this decision, four key factors must guide the way: risk management, the total cost of ownership (TCO), the pace of innovation and the holistic integration of people, processes and technology.

Download your free copy of the Industrial DataOps Buyer's Guide.

The decision to build or buy hinges significantly on risk assessment. While developing a custom solution offers unparalleled customization, it also introduces substantial operational and financial risk. The development process can encounter unforeseen complexities and overruns.

Conversely, purchasing a ready-made solution shifts the risk to the vendor, who is responsible for delivering a proven, tested system. This transfer of risk management is a crucial consideration, as it allows enterprises to mitigate unforeseen operational disruptions and maintain continuity.

The TCO encompasses more than the initial investment or subscription fee of a DataOps solution. For a custom-built system, this includes development costs, long-term maintenance, necessary hardware and the team required to support and innovate the system.

On the other hand, a bought solution has predictable costs with subscriptions and occasional upgrades. Additionally, leveraging a vendor's customer success team, which could boast decades of combined experience, adds significant value in navigating the system's lifecycle and reducing long-term costs through efficient use and continuous improvement.

Innovation velocity separates leaders from followers. Building a unique solution can lead to specific innovations tailored to the company's immediate needs. However, the pace at which a single enterprise can innovate is often slower than that of dedicated vendors who can leverage insights and feedback from a broad user base.

Vendors invest heavily in R&D, ensuring that their solutions remain at the cutting edge of technology and best practices. This divergence in the pace of innovation is critical to consider, as it directly impacts the enterprise's ability to remain competitive.

One of the most tangible challenges in the build approach is the requirement to stitch together multiple vendor solutions, creating a seamless workflow. This integration is not only complex but also costly to maintain over time. Each update or modification can require significant rework, leading to a perpetual maintenance cycle rather than innovation. The opportunity cost of this approach is immense, diverting resources from core manufacturing and operational tasks that directly contribute to the company's value proposition.

Successful DataOps implementation requires harmony between people, processes and technology. A bought solution often comes with established best practices, a roadmap for implementation and support structures that help align your team's efforts with the operational processes.

This harmony accelerates adoption and maximizes the impact of the technology. Moreover, learning from the vendor's experiences and other customers can help avoid common pitfalls, making the journey toward digital transformation smoother and more predictable.

At the heart of the build versus buy debate lies the concept of opportunity cost. The resources dedicated to developing, maintaining and innovating an in-house solution are resources diverted from the enterprise's core competencies and value-generating activities. In contrast, opting for a comprehensive, ready-to-deploy solution frees up these resources, allowing the enterprise to focus on what it does best: innovate in its manufacturing and operational processes.

In making the build versus buy decision, leaders must weigh the allure of customization and control against the benefits of speed, support and strategic focus offered by off-the-shelf solutions. As digital transformation accelerates across the industrial sector, the choice between building a customized DataOps solution or buying a market-ready platform has significant implications for an enterprise's agility, innovation capacity and competitive edge.

The wisdom in choosing between these paths lies in a clear-eyed assessment of the enterprise's strategic priorities, capacity for risk and the invaluable opportunity to learn from the experiences of others. By opting for a solution that minimally disrupts operations, supports rapid innovation and leverages the expertise of seasoned professionals, enterprise leaders can ensure that their organizations not only survive but thrive in the age of Industrial DataOps.

While the temptation to build a bespoke solution that perfectly fits the nuanced needs of an enterprise might be strong, the strategic advantages of purchasing a robust, flexible and continuously evolving DataOps platform cannot be understated. The right decision ensures not just operational efficiency and risk mitigation but also positions the enterprise at the forefront of innovation, ready to capitalize on the opportunities of the digital age.

Get started with Litmus today.